Kelly DeWolfe. This page is being revised to reflect new, shocking information.

My children were removed by the Children’s Aid Society on October 13th, 2005. Kaveh Khanverdi an unqualified CAS worker claimed the reason for their removal was that I accused my son T of being a spy for the Children’s Aid Society. This never happened. It was false. I showed that to be a ridiculous allegation. Nevertheless my children were removed and severed from me anyway. This is in Kaveh Khanverdi’s page. Since then this case has become malicious and vindictive. The file is now over a foot high. All of it more lies. I have seen three independent psychiatrist. All of them have found me quite sane. All of them have found no mental illness and no reason to give me treatment. Now the Children’s Aid through Andrew Bucknall, this is in his page, have changed their allegations and now say that I am suffering from PTSD. Andrew demanded that I get treatment for it despite no Doctor saying I need it. Andrew claimed that I suffer from PTSD because of my childhood abuse. For evidence he uses a 1969 report that states I had nightmares when I was a kid. Andrew told me that having nightmare when you are a child suffering from abuse is a “sign of mental health concerns.” This is on audio tape and will be in the Andrew page.

What is so ironic about that is that the CAS used comments from my abuser against me in court. The CAS used against me in court that I isolated myself and my children from my abuser, and Judge Sheffield took that information and advised that the children be considered being placed with my childhood abuser. This at the time I am waiting for Victims Compensation for the abuse. Starting to sound pretty ridiculous. Yup, that’s why they continue to lie to build some sort of case so they don’t have to look like they were negligent in the first place. Anyway that is some of the background information. I will dedicate this page to Kelly DeWolfe. I first met Kelly DeWolfe on October 17th, 2005. She was at my house with two police officers. One of the officers tried to brake open my back door with a shovel. This will be up in the video link. I let the police and Kelly DeWolfe into my house and they searched throughout my house for my son T as he ran away from them and wanted to come home. Neither of my children ever expressed any unhappiness or discontent in my home. Both said they were happy. Both children have been totally traumatized by this and want to come home. T attempted to come to court on October 18th, 2005 to speak to the Judge. T was confiscated as he walked into the court house by Kelly DeWolfe and two police officers. He was taken away and not allowed to speak to the Judge. I was going to paste the actual transcripts on this site, but I think it will take to much room and be to long to read. I will state here that everything I say is backed up in their affidavits or on audio tape or video tape. I will post some of these letters at the bottom of this page. I was not able to see C until October 25th, 2005. I went from being a loving, involved mother, to one facing ridiculous and false allegations and forced to see my children in a little room with a big mirror with workers watching and listening from behind a mirror. The workers on this day were Kelly DeWolfe and Kaveh Khanverdi. Kelly had told me that Kaveh would not be there. However I did see him behind the mirror. I was distressed that Kaveh could watch the visit and take more notes and give more false information. This he did. I did ask to speak to a manager that day about this and was told by Kelly that one would see me after the visit. I had by this time told the court and the CAS that Kaveh’s statements were not true and I could confirm it on audio tape. They were not interested. In fact a judge even used it against me that I taped him, not that he was dishonest. This was my cruel introduction to this totally unjust system where the truth don’t count, perjury runs rampant and the CAS can use the courts and the police to harass and destroy you and your children with no accountability. I said to Kaveh “You don’t mind a little bit of perjury.” the visit was terminated. I went to the office where I was first told by Kelly that I could see a manager. Kaveh instead forced me to leave the building. In Kaveh’s affidavit November 2nd. He states, “At this time the access visit was over and she must leave the building. Reluctantly she left the building. As she was leaving I provided Ms. xxxx with the letter from Ms. Kelly DeWolfe stating our expectations during the access visit. Ms. xxxx proceeded to turn on her camcorder and continued her accusations.” However the video taken contradicts Kaveh’s statements again. On the video I do not say anything to Kaveh. On the tape Kaveh accuses me of running from the building and asks me to come back. I do not say anything. Why would Kaveh state that I turned on my camcorder and continued my accusations when obviously it was on tape that I did not. Because he knows no one is going to watch it. Again Kaveh gets to exaggerate and this is used against me to sever me from my children some more. ( See video tape in Kaveh's page.) This was the last time I would see C for two months. In the parking lot Kelly DeWolfe gives me a letter telling me that phone calls with C will be monitored with a staff member listening on the line. October 27th, first phone Cole monitored by CAS with worker listening. C was upset that someone was listening. At this time the CAS was planning to put me in jail as T had run away from them again and did not want to go back. I told C that if he phoned and I did not answer for a few days it was because I was in jail. I got a warning from the worker. I thought it better to let C know where I was rather than have him think I have abandoned him and make him worried. On October 28th I was not able to talk to C. On October 29th, A worker at C’s group home let me talk to C to say good night. We had a pleasant three way conversation. On October 30th, I was finally able to have a conversation with C. This was Halloween and C was upset that this will be his first Halloween without a costume. He is not a happy child. We spoke about T as he was now listed in the newspapers and on television as missing. C knew that T was alright but he asked me if everyone else thinks he is dead, since he is listed as missing. I told C that no body thinks T is dead. C tells me that he was removed from school early Friday as the CAS told him that an unknown person was going to kidnap him. I was shocked. I was also certain that I would be confronted with more false allegations that would further sever me from my son. I was right. After I spoke to C I asked to speak to the worker who was listening on the phone, Todd. I told him that nobody was going to kidnap C and it was a false allegation. I expressed concern on how this incident could have scared C. Todd told me that they closed the school down on that day for the safety of the other children. I thought this was ridiculous as I was no ware near there and did not even know where C’s school was. On this day I was at home in the morning communication with my lawyer. In the afternoon I was at my lawyers office some thirty miles away from where C was. Todd told me to phone the group home manager the next day. I was concerned and wanted to clear myself so I do not get unfairly severed from C. The group home manager did not confirm or deny any allegations nor was I able to defend myself since I did not know exactly what the allegations were. I did mention that I was upset at having my conversations with C monitored. I did think it was illegal. On November 1st, 2005. Kaveh Khanverdi phoned me and accused me of harassing the group home staff. I am accused of false allegations. I attempted to speak to someone to clear up the allegation and I am accused of harassment. So now in court affidavits not only am I faced with the false allegations I am also faced with harassment allegations. I have come to know this as a common practice from the CAS. In Kelly DeWolfe’s affidavit on November 2, she states that, #19. “On 28 October 2005, I contacted C’s group home and asked them to keep closer watch on C. They advised on 27 October 2005, Ms. xxxx and C spoke on the phone and Ms. xxxx commented to C, if she were not home within 3-4 days then she would be arrested. On 30 October 2005, Ms. xxxx said during a conversation with C that someone took T and everyone thinks he is dead and missing. She further talked about court watch and the person who took T is a fraud and committed perjury.(I was talking about Kaveh)” #20 in Kelly DeWolfe’s affidavit she states that I should be suspended from access from C for two weeks do to my inappropriate behavior during phone calls and access visits. I was not able to see or talk to C for two months. I did tape record all phone calls that CAS were listening to so that I could protect myself against false allegations. Even though I did this it did not do any good. The managers at CAS don’t care. The judges don’t care and have just noted that I do not trust the CAS and that I accuse them of lying. It does no good. In fact I was still able to be punished from the same people I got lying or being negligent and was even more severely and cruelly restricted from my son. The CAS used this false information that I told C that T was dead and missing in court on November 7th, 2005 to try to put me in jail for contempt because T would not go back or at least would not stay with them. The CAS used it to falsely make me sound unstable and to show that I should not be near my children. On November 9th 2005, I e-mailed Raymond Mulldoon Director at CAS and I e-mailed Lisa Tripp manager at CAS with the transcript of the conversation I had with C on October 30th, I showed Kelly’s allegations to be false. I made them aware that the actual conversation is on tape. I spoke to Lisa Tripp about this on this day and followed up with a phone call to confirm that she received my e-mail. However on November 10th, 2005. This false information from Kelly DeWolfe was used in court against me to have my children taken away. Lisa Tripp sat in court and heard the false information being used. It is against the law to knowingly use false information in court and to mislead the judge. T was also in court that day and heard the false reasons for his removal; that I accused him of being a spy for the CAS, that I accused him of being Bi-Polar and that I told C that he was dead and missing. T also heard the Judge wrongly use the 1969 report that was deliberately misused. It clearly showed child abuse committed against me. T heard the Judge suggest that my children go to my abuser. T ran away from the CAS the next day. Now for the allegation that I was going to kidnap C. For which was also used to cruelly sever me from my children. I have no supporting audio tapes of this as it did not happen. I will use their own records that they provided to show again that Kaveh Khanverdi used false information. Kaveh Khannverdi in his affidavit of November 2nd, states that he canceled my access visits on November 1st because of my inappropriate behavior during the access visit. (I accused him of perjury) Kaveh Khanverdi further states that #20. Ms. xxxx has insinuated that she would be making some effort to remove C from his placement, and she continues to make telephone calls to the group home and to intimidate and harass the staff at the group home. #22, Kaveh’s affidavit supposedly quotes group home staff. “She states that they have kidnapped her children. Ms. xxxx implies that she is watching the group home and will bring charges against them.” Kaveh then states that I continue to be very intimidating and belligerent to staff. HOW EVER KELLY DEWOLFE PUTS IN AN AFFIDAVIT ON NOVEMBER 8th, WITH A POLICE REPORT OF AN INTERVIEW WITH C’S GROUP HOME STAFF MANAGER ON NOVEMBER 2nd. THAT DISPUTES BOTH HER ALLIGATION THAT I TOLD C THAT T WAS DEAD AND DISPUTES KAVEH’S ALLIGATIONS THAT I TOLD GROUP HOME STAFF I WAS WATCHING THEM AND INSINUATING THAT I WOULD TAKE C. ALSO THE CAS DID NOT PUT IN THEIR AFFIDAVIT’S THAT THE LICENSE NUMBER OF THE SUSPICOUSE VEHICLE WAS CHECKED AND IT WASN”T MINE.

Group Home Note from October 30, that Kelly Negligently used against me to sever me from my children.

Kelly's November 2 Affidavit.Press bar at right to hear the conversation that was used to ban communications for 2 months.

Det. Acres interview November 2.

Kelly DeWolfe’s November 8th, affidavit #17. “C does express that he wants to return to his mother’s care and is unable to see why he is in the care of the Society.” #18. “T has expressed that he doesn’t know why he is in the care of the Society and wishes to be in his mother’s care. With T’s consistently missing. The Society is obtaining a one-on one worker who will be with him at all times to defer him from running.” I had every reason to be concerned about the CAS listening on the phone. As Kelly DeWolfe read the short note from the group home staff where it is not specific on who spoke about T being dead or under what contexts. . She does not confirm the information before using it in court affidavits and uses it as a reason to sever any communications between myself and my children. This allegation was used against me in court on November 7th and on November 10th to remove my children. This is discredited not only by my tape recording of the conversation but by the interview Det Acres had with the manager of the group home staff on November 2, where the group home manager tells the police officer that I told C that T has a warm bed and good meals. This same day Kelly DeWolfe puts in her affidavit that I told C that T was dead and missing. Kelly put this interview with the police officer in her affidavit on November 8th. She knew the information that I told C that T was dead was false. The managers at the CAS by this time also knew the information was false. Both Lisa Tripp and Kelly DeWolfe sat in court on November 10th, heard this false information being used and knew it was false. This is a criminal offense. It has been taken out of the transcripts I ordered from those dates as well as other information that was said that the Society wishes they did not. Also missing from the November 10th, transcript was the CAS advising Judge Sheffield on the 1969 report and telling the Judge that it was evidence of “long term mental illness.” I will note here that I do not have a mental illness, have never been diagnosed with a mental illness and after being forced to see three psychiatrist by the Society, I still have not been found to suffer any mental illness. (I will post this information on the page 1969 report. It is interesting stuff. Unbelievable misleading the courts with medical records, also against the law.) Kaveh Khanverdi exaggerated the 1969 report, All it showed was symptoms of child abuse. The CAS knew that I was abuses as a child. Kaveh Khanverdi also used statements from my abuser and thus did wrongly advise the judge and almost had my children placed with my abuser. Also the report by Det Acres on November 2, 2005 with the group home manager disputes Kaveh’s allegations he put in his affidavit on November 2, 2005. It looks like Kaveh made those allegations to the police, that “I was watching the group home.” Det Acres asks the group home manager if I said I watching them and she said, “No, not that I am aware of.” Kaveh’s allegations were contradicted by the interview with police. Kaveh Khannverdi made more false allegations. The CAS managers, the courts, nobody cares that they use false information and continue to use false information. The workers are not accountable for anything. Thus C and I were cruelly severed any contact for two months. In their affidavits it states that I will be severed two weeks. It grew to two months. No reason was given. I believe that it was because T was in court on November 10th and heard the false reasons for his removal that he was thereafter restricted from communicating with his brother without Kelly DeWolfe monitoring the call and listening in. Kelly DeWolfe told T what he was allowed to talk about and warned him that if he did not do as she said she would end the conversation with his own brother. T was instructed not to talk about court. Kelly at this time told C that he was not allowed to see me so that I don’t give him wrong information. T was not allowed in court again. This of course to prevent him from hearing anymore false allegations. T is 15 years old and this restriction is against his right to attend the proceedings as they relate to him. C was never even informed about court by his own lawyer or ever given the opportunity to attend. This is against the Children’s rights to hear what their lawyer says for them in court. When ever I would attempt to tell the children what their lawyer said on their behalf in court my visit would be terminated. T was not happy in the group home or with CAS nor could he cope or understand the ridiculous reasons for their removal. T ran from the CAS repeatedly. He was living in a group home with workers and alarms on the windows and doors. The CAS took me to court and tried to throw me in jail because T would not stay with them. On November 6th, T turned himself into the CAS to prevent me from going to jail for contempt. The Kingston city police showed up to take T back to the CAS. The Kingston city police frisked T, read him his rights and was about to put handcuffs on him. T has never been in trouble in his life. He is just a boy who wants to live at home and go to school. The next day on November 7th, while court was in process we heard news that T again escaped from CAS custody. He jumped a fence and ran into the woods with a worker chasing after him. The children‘s counsel, T’s own lawyer, Lili Kramil Marcus suggested to the judge that I get put in jail to teach T a lesson, that he should know there are consequences to his conduct and that consequence should be that I get thrown in jail. Below, listen to T’s distressed call from the CAS group home the night he turned himself in, wondering why the police were going to handcuff him.. I decide I would rather be arrested then to see my child go through that again. Both children have been traumatized by this. What a terrible situation T was put in. Ripped from his home, his friends and his family. On November 10th, T heard the false reason‘s for his removal. Yet he was hunted down and terrorized by the police. The police would traumatize T, but will not look into the false statements used to remove the children or at Kaveh Khanverdi’s fraudulent qualifications he used to attain employment at the CAS. On November 21st judge Pedlar said that T can be put at my aunts house, a four hour drive away. T had never met her before. They were complete strangers to him. I had not seen her in 30 years. My aunt is a little bizarre. Her husband is a savant. That means he has a form of autism. They had just got back together after a marriage breakup as she had run off with another man. Her husband did not want T there. Before T was placed at my aunts the CAS took me court again because T would not stay with them. The CAS wanted to put a lean on my house and charge me upward of $26,000. The judge acknowledged that this could make us homeless. The week of March 10th, Raymond Muldoon executive director of CAS was giving interviews to the newspapers saying that many children come into their care because they have financial difficulties and problems with housing. Quite clearly the CAS was willing to take my children’s home. It was also Raymond Muldoon whom I e-mailed with the transcript of the conversation I had with child C which Kelly DeWolfe negligently and cruelly used to sever communications between us for two months. Mr. Muldoon took no action. This was a tremendously difficult situation for T. He stayed at my aunts only because he could still talk to me, If he was in CAS custody he would not be able to. T was also hoping that his brother C could be with him too, as in CAS custody they were separated. In fact by this time Kelly DeWolfe severed contact between the boys and only allowed them a few phone calls that would have her listening on the phone. On November 28th, 2005 I went to the CAS office to drop off letter’s for C and a DVD player as a gift. I also gave him Shrek figure candy canes. On November 30th, 2005 Kelly DeWolfe gave me a letter stating that every letter was banned as inappropriate. I could not give C the gifts as the court did not order it. She also informed me that C was not allowed to write me. On December 6th, 2005 I went to the CAS office to pick up T’s belongings and to pick up the DVD and candy canes that they would not give to C. I did pick up a candy cane and shake it and say to Kelly DeWolfe, “You wont even give a kid a candy cane before Christmas, you bitch.” On December 6th and 8th, I get letters outlining that I am hostile because of this incident. I am banned from the CAS office. The police will be called if I go near the CAS office. Kelly DeWolfe then says that I am not appropriate to be in public, the public is not safe with me, and uses this as to why I should not see C for Christmas in a restaurant. On December 8th, I was in Guelph visiting T. On this day T and C got their monitored phone call with Kelly DeWolfe listening on the phone. I was also listening on the phone. At least I got to hear C’s voice. T told C of some of the things I had bought him. I had to listen as C said, “I wish she would buy me something.” He was sounding angry at me for this forced abandonment. I could hear the rejection in his voice. I was glade that T told him that I had indeed bought him something but the CAS would not give it to him. C was upset and confused as to why he could not get gifts. It was only then Kelly interrupted the conversation and told C that I did have a gift for him although he could not have it. In Kelly’s affidavit, she writes that after this conversation she told C that he was allowed to write me letters now but they would have to go threw her. I of course have never received a letter. In Kelly DeWolfe affidavit of December 13th, she states that on December 8th she told child C that he was allowed to receive gifts. Of course he was not, but this looks good for the judge. I of course was presented to the judge as hostile and there for banned any Christmas with either child. During this visit with T in Guelph as was my court order to do so at this time. The CAS did not though inform the police and take off the Ontario wide watch for my car. T and I had dinner at a restaurant and were driving back to my aunts when I was stopped by the police and detained in the back of a police car for 30 minutes. T took video of this. (See in video section) When I was in Guelph visiting T on December 8th, my car broke down. I was not able to get it fixed for a week leaving me stranded. I had my two dogs with me. The temperature at that time was below freezing. The Children’s Aid Society started a barrage of letters and phone calls to have me leave my aunts house as I was breaking the court order. My aunts farm is 45 minutes from no where. No hotel would have taken me with my dogs. My aunt was not willing to watch my dogs without me being there. The CAS was forcing me out in freezing temperatures with no possible place to go. This placed me at great risk. This was painful that they would so carelessly disregard my life. My aunt and her husband decided that the only thing we could do was lie to the Society and tell them that I had left. Andrew Buchnall, Kelly DeWolfe’s partner phoned my aunts home to make sure that I had left. My aunt’s husband lied and said that I did. He then became angry at me and said that the CAS could make him lose his job and throw him in jail. This further damaged a difficult situation at my aunts and made her husband very resentful. Here’s some statements from Kelly DeWolfe’s affidavit’s during this time. She requests more restrictive contact between myself and T. I was still not allowed any contact with C. Her reason is as follows. #16. “The request for restrictive phone access is due to Aunt reporting that T would become upset during phone calls with his mother and would begin to repeat her concerns regarding the court case.” Poor kid. He gets removed from a home he did not want to leave Gets put in a bad situation and if he sounds upset the solution is to sever him from me even more! This is child cruelty and forced abandonment. Totally unreasonable that the Society expects the child not to be upset. Kelly DeWolfe’s Affidavit February 10th, # 6.” On 13 January I spoke with Xxxxx from family Counseling and Support services in Guelph, ON. He advised he saw T once on 03 January 2006 and he felt T was a good advocate for himself though could use ongoing counseling as he has a strong pull from his mother. Mr. Xxxxx stated he felt T would not utilize counseling. Kelly DeWolfe takes the natural strong bonding of mother and child and calls it a strong pull that needs counseling to sever. T said that he and the counselor could not understand why he was removed from his home. I spoke to counselor and he wished he could help get T back home. I asked for his counseling record with T but by law T is in CAS custody and I can’t get the record. The counselor said that he would offer it to the CAS but he advised me that they would not likely ask for it as it does not look good for them. Kelly DeWolfe’s affidavit January 9th, 2006. I got written up because I attended T’s school in Guelph to help T get registered in the new school while he was staying in Guelph. I also got written up in the affidavit because I went on a school field trip with T to a museum. Kelly wrote a letter to Guelph CAS to make sure I don’t participate in my child’s education again. Not allowed. Aren’t they supposed to be encouraging this sort of thing? Kelly DeWolfe also writes in her affidavit #12. “CAS will not continue T’s dental treatment for his braces as we did not enter into the agreement with the dentist..” T was living in a group home at that time. In November the CAS claimed in court they had spent $26,000 on court costs so far. The cost would now be astronomical with court costs, lawyer costs, worker costs, group home costs, ect. Yet the CAS will not take over a child’s dental treatment at $80.00 a month but will instead leave him with braces that are now just hanging off his teeth causing pain and not doing any benefit. #5. In Kelly’s affidavit she reports that on December 19th, against court order I attempted to phone C’s group home hoping to speak with him. I had not spoken to C since October 30th, because of her false allegations. This is just cruel treatment that likely will have lasting affects on C. It is not normal or natural for a mother to just walk away from her children and expect that children can go threw this and not be harmed. In Kelly’s affidavit November 13th, she writes that, “In regards to Christmas access, if it is felt that a worker needs to be in the same room as Ms. xxxxx and C and not in the community give Ms. Xxxx's recent behaviors. (Meaning the candy cane incident.) As outlined in #4 it states “The CAS offices offer the only secure facility for the visits.” I have never beaten my children. I have never been hostile to my children. I have never verbally abused my children. I have been nothing but loving to my children. I shook a candy cane at a worker who cruelly severed me from my children. The punishment. I was only able to see C on December 23rd. For Christmas in the little room with the big mirror and no Christmas decorations, with two workers watching and a cop posted outside the door. I was not allowed at my aunts house for Christmas. I was allowed one phone call. The children had the worst Christmas in their life. After restricting me any access to C for two months before Christmas, Kelly then writes in an affidavit that C did not like what I got him for Christmas. Of course after restricting me from finding out what he wanted for Christmas. There was no communicating with the CAS. Just this incredible cruel bullying. On January 3rd and 4th, I spoke to Andrew Bucknall on the phone. He admitted to me to leaving out half of a medical record in his affidavits. This was of course so it will mislead and look good for them. He admits that he left out page one of a medical record that said in 2004 I had a mini stroke. He puts in his affidavit the medical record from the day after, that I had an emotional outburst at work and was at the hospital complaining of dizziness and a lightheadedness. I was still recovering from my stroke and should not have gone to work the next day. I did cry at work as I was not feeling well and I did go back home. This is in affidavits against me by the CAS. This is sleazy. More so it is illegal to deliberately mislead the court. I don’t think they have to worry as no judge has cared how many time they do. Andrew Bucknall told me in these conversations that he demands I get treatment for PTSD. (Remember they took my children because Kaveh Khanverdi said that I was delusional and accused T of being a spy for the CAS. See Kaveh’s page for records of this ridiculous allegation.) As evidence Andrew Buchnall brings up the 1969 report that says I had nightmares. Andrew tells me that nightmare’s when you are a child is a mental health concern. According to Andrew it proves a long history of mental illness. I have no history of mental illness, despite the CAS willingness to grossly mislead the records. No Doctor is willing to give me treatment for something I don’t have despite these CAS workers demanding that I do. (Hear these conversations in Andrew’s page.) I called him an idiot. Andrew writes in his affidavit that I was abusive to him. He then uses this to show I am uncooperative and hostile. The judge looks at that and notes I am uncooperative and hostile. On January 5th, 2006. My aunt, I did mention she was strange. She told Kelly DeWolfe that T was dangerous with an ax and had threatened C over Christmas. My aunt also told Kelly DeWolfe that she had seen a hand gun at my house before Christmas. On this date I had the police at my house for the reported gun. T was becoming extremely distressed at my aunts house and was fearful that her husband would assault him. T phoned me very distresses on this date. What my aunt had seen was a broken plastic BB gun with springs sticking out. The police closed the report saying they were certain that I did not have a gun at my house. Hear the tape below of T’s and my conversation over the gun and the police conversation saying the call was cleared, they did not think I had a gun. The children’s Aid must have known that my aunt was a little weird. I was present in Guelph when a Guelph CAS worker arrived to do a home study on my aunt. One of the questions given to her was did she own a gun. My aunt got up from the table, she stormed from the kitchen into the living room and grabbed a long barreled gun that was leaning against the wall, marched back to the CAS worker, shoved the loaded gun in front of her and exclaimed that this was her gun. He face was flushed and she angrily said they use it to shoot at their neighbors dogs. My aunt then said that it was alright because her husband it a terrible shot and they usually just hit the barn. I saw the look on the CAS workers face. I am sure she thought my aunt a little off. You would think the CAS would have more carefully verified my aunts information that T was dangerous with an ax and I had a gun. I was of course worried about more false allegations and I phoned the Guelph CAS to tell them that the report of the gun was checked out by the police and it was a false allegation and I do not have a gun. I could not talk to the CAS as T was distressed and was phoning and I could not hear the worker. I calmed T down and half an later phoned the Guelph CAS back to see if they would make a report that there is no gun. She said she would not. An hour after this the Kingston Children’s Aid phones me and accuses me of harassing the Guelph Children’s Aid and phoning repeatedly and tying up their phone lines. I timed both conversations and taped them, they were one minute each. This is confirmed by my phone bill. So here we go again. I get false allegations. I try to say something about the false allegations before it gets out of hand and used against me to sever my children more and I am yet again accused of harassment. T ran away from my aunts home that night. He was surrounded by four cruisers and the police threatened to put their dog on him. T stayed at the police station until the CAS came to pick him up. On January 10th 2006 At about 9 am I received a notice to appear in court in 30 minutes. I was checked for a gun before court. The affidavit stated that I had a gun. That T threaten C with an ax. CAS uses it to restrict access between T and I. They also used this to restrict access of T and brother C. What is totally unacceptable is that the CAS and even T’s own lawyer did not speak to the boys about this before using it in court. After putting T in that very difficult situation, nobody bothered to speak to him about it. T’s own lawyer, who now thinks she does not even need to consult her clients before injuring them in court. Lili Kramil Marcus told the judge that child C was at risk from child T and that T had “real deep behavior problems.” T has no behavior problems. Has never had any behavior problems. Lili Kramil Marcus got her information from my aunt at 6 o’clock Friday night on January 6th, 2006. She gave this ‘evidence’ in court Tuesday January 10th, That is four days. She could not find the time to contact either of the boys. The next day on January 11,2006. I had a supervised visit with T and C in the CAS little room. There were two police cruisers outside the building. There were two CAS workers watching from behind the mirror and two cops. (See video of two unfriendly cops in the parking lot after my visit.) I spoke to T and C about what happened at my aunts over the ax. I was the only one to have asked them. Nothing happened. C was never threatened. The boys thought it was stupid. We talked about the broken BB gun that was reported. This is when I learned T was surrounded by four cruisers in Guelph. At the bottom of this page hear the tape of the boys during this visit denying the ax allegation. It was just two brothers playing around. Still the CAS used that as fact in front of the court on March 6th, 2006. and stated that, “T held a hatchet to his brother’s throat. When the aunt sought to retrieve the weapon, T ran from his aunt’s home.” This is not what happened. The CAS is now working to set up child T as something he is not, just the same as they are slandering me, they now slander a child for their own gain. They are working to divide and destroy this family. Also in this visit of January 11th, the day after court when the children had no representation and were cruelly separated and labeled. I asked T, “Why weren’t you in court yesterday.” T said, “I was never told about it.” CAS worker Shannon Mcleod immediately interrupted the visit and warned me that we were not to discus court. Hear this exchange on tape below. It is obvious all our right are being denied. On January 18th, 2006 I had another supervised visit with T and C. I had by then comprehended how badly the children were represented and how badly that would affect their relationship and our family. Near the end of the visit I protested that both children have a right to go to court and the fact they did not talk to the children before court leading them to give false evidence to the court. Don’t think that I could have spoken to CAS later. They refuse to discus anything with me at any time. I asked Andrew, “Will you tell T when he has court.” Andrew says, “No we wont. We’ll tell him what he needs to know.” Hear this exchange is on tape below Andrew severed the visit. In his affidavits he sites my behavior for ending the visit. Kelly DeWolfe states in her February 10th, affidavit that, “Ms. Xxxxx made inappropriate comments about the society providing false information.” T gave me a letter this day that stated his intention to go on a hunger strike if he were not returned to my custody. See letter in children’s voice’s letter page. The CAS response to that was to arrange our visits so that the children could not sneak me letters. I went to give T’s lawyer Lili Kramil Marcus T’s letter stating his intention to go on a hunger strike and she slammed the door in my face. This is recorded on hidden camera see video page. They like it rigged. They can be negligent, put forth false and harmful information. then watch over us so we don‘t disuse it and the children never find out. This is a total obstruction of justice or lack thereof. If they do wrong then they get to make sure you can’t talk about it. This against the children’s basic rights. This would also prevent the children from complaining that their rights were violated at all as they would not only be violated but prevented from finding out about it. T ran away after that. He will not be going back. I do not care if they threaten to throw me in jail again or to take my house again. I will not in all conscience force my child into that situation again, he has been traumatized enough. Obviously at the CAS nobody listens to the children. Click here and hear the report of the toy gun. The January 11 visit with my children, they deny the ax incident. The worker interrupting our visit when I ask T why he was not in court and was told that no one told him about it. Hear the tape of January 18th, of Andrew telling me they will not tell T when there is court. Kelly DeWolfe’s affidavit February 10th, 2006. #12. “On 25 January 2006 C and Ms. xxxxx had a supervised access visit at the Society. About an hour into the visit, Ms. xxxxx began whispering to C while she was hugging him. Mr. Bucknall advised Ms. xxxxx she is not allowed to whisper in the visit. Ms. xxxxx responded with comments about T not being a spy and not being allowed to hug her child. Mr. Bucknall advised Ms. xxxxx this was her one warning and left the room. “ The CAS started taking my purse and my coat before each visit with my children to make sure that I do not have a recording devise. I had a tape recorder hidden on me. Check NEWS UPDATE page… Kelly DeWolfe takes me to court to sever communications with C because of the February 8th visit… Kelly claims that she felt threatened. That she thought I would break through the glass. Hear the tape yourself of the incident. No reasonable person would have felt threatened. Andrew Buchnall claims in his affidavit that police were called over an argument because I wanted child C to write a letter complaining of his lawyer. Child C was not allowed. Andrew told me that child C could write a letter at his group home and it would go to his lawyer. Andrew states in his affidavit that child C and was endangered. That child C had to be taken to a place of safety. Child C was not in the room at the time. Very clear CAS bullies, unreasonable demands. cruel separations. Goodness if you get angry and stand up for your Childs and your rights you will be severed some more and they will lie and exaggerate some more. Kelly DeWolfe is caught on tape deliberately lying in her affidavit to make me sound crazy. Hear the tape and see her affidavit in News Update page. Also in court when CAS went to sever me from child C over this visit, the children’s lawyer Lili kramil Marcus again gives the court false information to further damage the child with this forced abandonment.

Kelly deWolfe's affidavit November 30th.

Letter's to C band by Kelly deWolfe

Kelly's letter. C is not allowed to write me. C is not allowed to get gifts or candy canes. All my letters were baned.

CAS exagerates and banes me from CAS offices.

Kelly DeWolfe wrongly accused me of telling C that T was dead and missing. This was used to cruelly sever any contact between C and I for two month. During that time she was to also separate the brothers and monitor their calls. She banned every letter I wrote to C. She banned the gift I gave him and she banned C from even recieving candy canes. She banned C from writting to me. She did not even let C know I was trying to give him things. I did wave a candy cane at her and say, "You wont even give a kid a candy cane before christmas, you bitch." She then writes me up as hostile, and then says this shows that I do not belong in the community either. I am to unsafe. Kelly's discription of the incident is very exagerated. The letter states I was "waving a Shrek figure candy cane in a threatening maner." Because of this I was only allowed to see C after two months on December 23, our Christmas visit, we spent in the little room with a big mirror, no christmas decorations, two workers watching and a cop posted outside the door. Incredible bullying by CAS.

Kelly DeWolfe's affidavit December 13th,

Note: Kelly DeWolfe puts false information in her December 13th, affidavit so that she does not look bad for her actions in restricting C from getting gifts or candy canes. It was in this December 8th conversation that C found out through T that I had tried to give him a gift. Kelly told C that I did have a gift for him but he could not have it. In this December 13th, affidavit Kelly states that she told C on December 8th, that he could receive gifts. But check out her previous letters and affidavits. Kelly’s affidavit from November 30th states that on November 28th, I dropped off the letters a DVD and candy canes. Note, her letter of November 30th, which states that all letters were banned and C was not allowed to receive gifts. Note; the CAS letter from December 6th, that says I was picking up the gifts and waved a Shrek candy cane figure at Kelly. Now note her affidavit that says that two days after I was forced to pick up C’s gifts that she told C that I was allowed to give him gifts. Right! At least this is what she tells the court.

Judges order giving me access on february 15.

Letter from Society on February 15 denying me access